Guide
AI Model Cost Comparison: OpenAI vs Anthropic vs Gemini
GPT-4o, Claude 3.5 Sonnet, and Gemini 1.5 Pro token pricing side by side, plus how an AI gateway automates routing and caching to cut your bill.
Pricing at a glance
Prices are quoted per million tokens (1M = ~750k words). Input tokens are what you send to the model; output tokens are what it generates back. Output is always more expensive.
| Model | Input / 1M | Output / 1M | Context | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OpenAI GPT-4o | $2.50 | $10.00 | 128k | Strong general reasoning; multi-modal. |
| OpenAI GPT-4o mini | $0.15 | $0.60 | 128k | Fastest tier at OpenAI, great cache target. |
| Anthropic Claude 3.5 Sonnet | $3.00 | $15.00 | 200k | Best-in-class on long-context reasoning. |
| Anthropic Claude 3.5 Haiku | $0.80 | $4.00 | 200k | Cheap small-class model with long context. |
| Google Gemini 1.5 Pro | $1.25 | $5.00 | 2M | Massive context; aggressive prompt-caching discount. |
| Google Gemini 1.5 Flash | $0.075 | $0.30 | 1M | Cheapest mainstream model; ideal default route. |
Pricing changes frequently — these are the publicly listed rates at the time of writing. Always verify on the provider's pricing page before locking in a budget.
The hidden lever: caching
Most production traffic is repetitive — same support questions, same RAG snippets, same system prompt prefixes. All three providers now offer some form of prompt caching:
- OpenAI automatically caches identical prefixes >1024 tokens and discounts cached input tokens up to 50%.
- Anthropic exposes explicit cache breakpoints; cached input reads cost 10% of base, with a 25% write surcharge on first miss.
- Google bills cached Gemini tokens at roughly 25% of the live rate, plus a small per-hour storage fee.
None of these schemes catch semantically identical prompts — "Refund my order #123" and "Please cancel and refund my order 123" hit the model twice at full price. A semantic cache embeds each prompt and serves a stored response when the cosine similarity crosses a threshold (we use 0.92 by default). That's where the cheapest tokens come from: tokens you never send.
Where an AI gateway fits
An AI gateway like ZeroCredit AI gives you one HTTP endpoint that:
- Checks the semantic cache first — instant, zero-cost reply on a hit.
- Routes the request to the cheapest model that can plausibly handle the prompt (or to the fastest, balanced, or premium tier you've configured).
- Logs cost, latency, and a baseline-vs-actual savings number per request.
- Enforces per-team daily / weekly / monthly budgets before the upstream call happens.
The same OpenAI-compatible JSON body works for every provider, so you don't rewrite application code when prices shift — the routing engine just picks a different upstream.
A simple cost model
Suppose your app sends 1M requests/month averaging 500 input + 300 output tokens. On GPT-4o that's roughly $2,750/month. Route the same traffic through Gemini 1.5 Flash and you're at $128/month — a 95% reduction before caching even kicks in. Add a 40% cache hit rate on top and the bill drops to ~$77/month.
Not every request can run on the cheapest model — that's why ZeroCredit AI ships with four routing modes and a per-request override. The point isn't to use one model for everything; it's to stop paying premium prices for prompts that don't need them.
Try it on your own traffic
Spin up a free account, point one endpoint at the gateway, and see your real savings number after 24 hours.
Start free →